Recent government announcements have left employers and training providers fearing for the future of apprenticeships, according to the Building Engineering Services Association (BESA).
The Association’s director of competence and compliance Jill Nicholls said there was an “uncomfortable undertone” undermining the activities and celebrations around this year’s National Apprenticeship Week.
“Judging by what we have seen from the government so far, it looks like 2026 will be a year when the reputation of apprenticeships could go either way – it’s on a knife edge,” said Nicholls.
She lamented that what is usually a week to champion collaboration between employers, government, training providers and assessment organisations had become an anxious debate about“streamlining and dumbing down of quality”.
“After years of building reputation, quality and take-up following the Richards Review, it is frustrating to see this go into reverse, just when the construction and built environment sectors need quality and rigour more than ever,” said Nicholls
“The need to ensure everyone working on buildings is professionally competent isn’t optional, it’s a necessity if we are to prevent another Grenfell.”
The government has announced a review of all 700 apprenticeship standards currently available with a view to “streamlining” the system and removing those with low take-up even though many of those are in critical specialist technical professions. Many employers fear that ministers intend to reduce choice by simply removing programmes that are not directly linked to government priorities.
Others have suggested the exercise is aimed at freeing up funding for new initiatives including foundation apprenticeships and short courses called ‘apprenticeship units’ through the reformed growth and skills levy which starts in April. This is intended to give employers more choice over how they spend their levy pots in line with a commitment made in Labour’s election manifesto.
Joined up
“The government is not joined up on this issue with some departments arguing for streamlining to save money, while the Building Safety Regulator is calling for competence, compliance with the Building Safety Act, and making sure routes to competence are clearly defined and mandated,” said Nicholls.
She said that using a ‘sampling system’ to speed up assessment of an apprentice’s skills, knowledge, experience and behaviour (SKEB) would not stand up to legal examination in court if an employer is challenged to prove their employee was fully competent.
A coalition of construction bodies including BESA has launched a NAW campaign #saveourapprenticeship to persuade the government to rethink its approach and is also working with the Skills England Construction Taskforce to find practical solutions to the current stalemate. The campaign is headed by Helen Hewitt, CEO of the British Woodworking Federation (BWF), on behalf of all construction-related sectors.
“It is counterintuitive for a government that claims to be focused on improving professional standards across construction in the wake of the Grenfell Tower disaster to be compromising the quality of this crucial route to competence,” said Nicholls.
“Everyone in the competence supply chain from Skills England to training providers to employers has a role to play in ensuring the competence of workforces in line with clear, legal responsibilities enforceable under the Building Safety Act.”
Budget
In her November budget, the Chancellor Rachel Reeves pledged an additional £725million to create 50,000 more apprenticeships in this parliament, but £140m of that is being allocated to mayors to help them connect NEETs (not in education,employment or training) to local employers as part of a wider review of educational priorities.
A statement from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) said: “We are committed to creating an apprenticeship system that addresses the nation’s skills challenges head on and are simplifying it to give businesses the flexibility to develop the skills they need.
“We have been working intensively with businesses on the next stages of reform and will consider their feedback before making any decisions about changes to funding apprenticeship standards.”